Debtors Can No longer Retain Vehicle by Making Monthly Payments Without Reaffirming or Redeeming
Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Company (In re Dumont)
9th Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 08-60002, September 15, 2009
Ford Motor Credit Company repossessed a Chapter 7 debtor’s vehicle, without any warning, about three months after discharge, when she was current on her post-petition monthly payments. (The record is unclear whether she had ever defaulted on payments pre-petition.) The balance on the loan exceeded the value of the vehicle. The contract contained an “ipso facto” clause, stating that debtor’s filing of a bankruptcy case would be in itself constitute a default of the contract. Her Statement of Intentions had stated that she would “retain the collateral and continue to make regular payments” The creditor sent a proposed reaffirmation agreement and then its attorney sent an email to debtor’s attorney requesting reaffirmation, but debtor’s attorney “declined the offer.” (The terms of the reaffirmation offer were not clear from the record.) After the repossession, Debtor reopened the case and claimed that Ford Motor Credit had violated the discharge injunction. The bankruptcy court for the Southern District of California denied the motion. The 9th Circuit affirmed the denial.
For free or low cost help with reaffirmation hearing click.